Tuesday - 15 April, 2008Plant Breeder's Rights actions in the Federal CourtAccording to a notice to practitioners posted on the Vic Bar website, plant breeder's rights actions for infringement in the Federal Court will now be regarded as intellectual property cases for the purposes of docket allocation and allocated to one of Heerey (Convenor), Sundberg, Weinberg, Kenny, Jessup, Middleton and Gordon JJ. Tuesday - 15 April, 2008Purple hazeFollowing the reconvened trial on remitter from the Full Court which ruled that expert evidence had been impermissibly excluded at first instance, Heerey J has ruled that Darrell Lea was not misrepresenting itself or its products as Cadbury products between 2000 and 2004 when it used a dark shade of purple for Christmas promotions ... Tuesday - 15 April, 2008NanotechnologyDid you know there was an Australian Office of Nanotechnology? It has a strategy which commenced in July 2007 Key initiatives within the strategy are: * a state-of-the-art atomic force microscope for the National Measurement Institute (NMI) to provide new calibration service for nanoscale standards in Australia; * a Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Working Group to coordinate regulatory issues relating to nanotechnology; and * a Public Awareness and Engagement Program. You can find out more about the Office and the Strategy ... Monday - 14 April, 2008MetatagsProf. Goldman reports that the 11th Circuit has found the use of a competitor's trade marks in metatags is trade mark infringement. Along the way, the 11th Circuit took some swipes at the 2nd Circuit's When-U ruling and, perhaps confusingly, sought to limit the scope of their own ruling ... Saturday - 12 April, 2008The Trials of ArtNow that the High Court has enjoined judges not to be in terror of making artistic judgments, perhaps we should be reading Daniel McClean's The Trials of Art which, according to IPKat includes an intro by Lord Hoffmann referring to that Hensher case ... Saturday - 12 April, 2008GIs for FoodIPKat positively reviews Geographical Indications For Food Products: international, legal and regulatory perspectives by Marsha A. Echols ... Friday - 11 April, 2008Sorry 2Presumably, as part of efforts to implement Sorry in a meaningful way, IP Australia has adopted a Reconciliation Action Plan (pdf), which has been officially endorsed by Reconciliation Australia... Friday - 11 April, 2008Patent failure part 2Remember how Professors Besson and Meurer started summarising their thesis that patents (at least in the US) are not providing the incentives to innovation they are supposed to? There is a second instalment 'The Costs and Benefits of Patents to Innovators' ... Friday - 11 April, 2008Sponsored linksRemember how, in a world first, the ACCC sued Google and the Trading Post over "sponsored links" which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive. Well, the Australian IT reports that Telstra has settled with the ACCC, admitting that its Trading Post division had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct ... Tuesday - 08 April, 2008Copyright in an idea or an expression?Kim Weatherall, abandoning her self-imposed exile, has a close look at recent Federal Court decisions finding that one project home builder's plans had been infringed by others who adopted the alfresco feature ... Saturday - 05 April, 200838 years is almost too longThe Court of Appeal has partly upheld an appeal in the Whiter Shade of Pale case ... Friday - 04 April, 2008LinklatersLinklaters' latest edition of their EU IP update is online here. Friday - 04 April, 2008Resale rightNow that the new (?) Labor Federal Government is planning to introduce a resale right for visual artists, you may want to review the Intellectual Property Institute's report on the operation of the UK right ... Wednesday - 02 April, 2008AjinomotoThe Full Court has dismissed Ajinomot's appeal from Finkelstein J's finding that its patent for a new artificial sweetener was invalid because it lacked an inventive step. The main point in the appeal was whether the botched attempt to introduce the diligent searcher via s 7(3) - in the form it stood before the 2001 amendments - meant it was necessary to identify a person skilled in the art in Australia. It turns out that the short answer was "Yes", but there was in fact such a person ... Wednesday - 02 April, 2008WIPO UDRP reviewWIPO has published its review of the operation of the UDRP for 2007 ... |